People that support the "conference of champions" shouldn’t be mad at the fact that 3 teams got in when they all performed at low levels. USC barely escaped a loss in the first round of the NIT. Also, it felt like USC didn't even want to play to begin the game. Arizona was a huge disappointment they played soft as Charmin tissue paper, and lost by 21 to a tough Buffalo team. Buffalo took the heart out of Arizona and was the more aggressive team. It was apparent that Arizona wasn't focused, because in interviews after the game two players declared for the draft showing they were more focused on that. I'll take Bagley over Ayton any day of the week. Syracuse beat Arizona State by four in a game Syracuse trailed majority of the time. A lot of people argued that Arizona State shouldn't have been in the tourney in the first place. Arizona State needs to recruit better, they don't have a four men decent enough to hit a free throw line jumper to break down the 2-3 zone. UCLA lost to St. Bonaventure by 7 in their play-in game. Maybe if UCLA had Liangelo ball they would’ve won the game, and I'm not convinced Steve Alford can coach. I wish I would lose to a team referred to as "The Bonnies". The Pac-12 conference had nothing to show for in the tournament all the teams should of just stayed at home.